compare the Common features of principal preparation programmes..
Compression of Common Features of Principal Preparation Programmes around the
developed countries
Introduction
– Method
The study compared 20 selected studies that contain a considerable number of principal preparation
programmes. The programmes in the selected studies represented a diversity of approaches, designs,
policy contexts, and collaborations between universities and school districts. all programmes have been
examined by the scholars who done these studies. For example, the selected studies showed that all
programmes faculty and administrators, participants and graduates were interviewed. In addition, they
reviewed programmes documents, courses, and workshops. In several selected studies, programme
participants and graduates were surveyed by scholars or the institutions where they study about their
readiness, exercises, and approaches, comparing their responses to principals who have not previously
participated in PPP. This implies all data in the selected studies have already been reviewed and
published. Therefore, this research will extract programmes data from the selected studies directly to
use them in the comparison. At the same, each programme will be checked separately if there are any
changes or update to selected programme. Furthermore, several studies compared between more than
ten PPPs and therefore it is hard to include all programmes. Hence, suffice it to mention key results of
the study with indicating to common features of programmes.
Order instruction
all selected studies contain one or two or more of principal preparation programmes. The first
require is to (1) compare the Common features of principal preparation programmes WHICH are
The purpose of PPP, target group, mandatory or optional, funding, programme duration, Face-to-face/
residential online, action learning, peer Learning /Cohort group Internship, exemplary school visits
assessment of participants, university accreditation, recruitment and selection process, technology
use, clinical practice and linking professional development with certification.
– So take each comparison element from above and talk about it then mention the
programmes that have the same features. If you check the study number 3 by Huber 2044
and number 16 by walker 2013 have the same style of comparison. So follow them please
(2) What are missing features that programmes should be included
(3) what are the prominent achievements in principal preparation programmes such as the content
of curricular, education policy, history of education, skills…
The link for selected studies
https://ufile.io/u19xc
please don’t use any further sources just the selected studies
compare the Common features of principal preparation programmes.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
